|
|
The limestone forced oxidation process (LSFO) is a wet process which can produce wallboard grade gypsum. The process is based on the reaction bewteen a limestone suspension and the flue gases. Technologies and scrubber desingers intend to promote maximum gas-liquid surface area and residence time in order to perform high removal efficiencies (up to 99%).
The sulfur containing slurry is then oxidized to produce solid FGD-gypsum which is removed from the slurry by physical separation (filter, decanter...).
Large number of wet scrubber designs have been used in wet FGD systems, including spray towers (the most used), venturis, plate towers, and mobile packed beds. Because of scale buildup, plugging, or erosion, which affect FGD dependability and absorber efficiency, the trend is to use simple scrubbers such as spray towers instead of more complicated ones. The configuration of the tower may be vertical or horizontal, and flue gas can flow cocurrently, countercurrently, or crosscurrently with respect to the liquid. The chief drawback of spray towers is that they require a higher liquid-to-gas ratio requirement for equivalent SO2 removal than other absorber designs.
Flowchart illustrates a LSFO system equipped with a traditionnal spray tower.

This process, as all FGD processes, has some advantages and disadvantages. As shown here under, all the reactions required by the process are done in the scrubber, the physical separation is the only step required outside the absorber.
Main advantages of LSFO process
Use of limestone which is generally cheaper than lime
Marketable / Saleable by-product (wallboard quality gypsum)
Wet process (> higher contact between reagent and flue gas)
Well-known process, many engineering able to design FGD unit
Main disadvantages of LSFO process
Molecular weight of limestone higher than for lime (> more tons of reagent is required to achieve the removal of 1 ton of SO2)
Extra CO2 emission due to the reaction between limestone and SO2
Preparation of the reagent (suspension of micronized CaCO3) use a lot of energy and milling step is more complicated than lime based process. Use of milled limestone is simple but milled limestone cost is more expensive
Wet slurry to be treated
Low FGD-gypsum market in some regions
See also:
|